MRI Web Clinics
Home 9 Web Clinic 9 Free Disc Fragment
MRI Web Clinic - January 2004

Free Disc Fragment

Download this Web Clinic in PDF

Name*
Click submit to be taken directly to your .pdf download.

Clinical History: 55 year-old man with right leg pain. T1-weighted sagittal (1a), T2-weighted sagittal (1b) and T2-weighted axial (1c) images are provided. What is your diagnosis?

1a

1b

1c

Figure 1:

T1-weighted sagittal (1a), T2-weighted sagittal (1b) and T2-weighted axial (1c) images

Findings

2a

2b

2c

Figure 2:

An ovoid ventral epidural defect is present just inferior to the L5-S1 disc (arrows) resulting in mass effect on the right S1 nerve root (arrowhead) and causing ventral flattening of the thecal sac (short arrow). This abnormality demonstrates intermediate signal intensity on the T1-weighted image (2a) and becomes mildly hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences (2b,2c).

Answer

Right paracentral free disc fragment from L5-S1, resulting in mass effect on the right S1 nerve root.

Discussion

An important, frequently difficult to diagnose, type of disc herniation is a free disc fragment or sequestered disc herniation. A sequestered disc herniation occurs when extruded disc material is no longer contiguous with the parent nucleus pulposus. The free disc fragment typically lateralizes and may migrate superiorly or inferiorly. Rare cases of intradural and posterior epidural extension have also been described.1,2

Sequestered disc fragments are sometimes difficult to detect with MRI. In addition to their propensity to migrate, free fragments often demonstrate high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, thought to result from increased water content.3 On T2-weighted non-fat-suppressed images, the high signal intensity disc fragment may blend with epidural fat and cerebrospinal fluid within the thecal sac. In these cases, T1-weighted images become crucial in detecting the free disc material. The sequestered fragment maintains an intermediate to low signal on T1-weighted images, allowing ready differentiation of the fragment from epidural fat.

3a

Figure 3:

(3a) T1-weighted sagittal view of the lumbar spine demonstrates spondylotic changes at multiple levels and a large ventral epidural intermediate signal mass posterior to the L3 vertebral body (arrow), compatible with a large free fragment.

4a

Figure 4:

(4a) On the T2-weighted sagittal view at the same location as 2a, the free disc fragment (arrow) is markedly hyperintense and difficult to identify.

5a

Figure 5:

(5a) T1-weighted axial view demonstrates the free disc fragment in a left paracentral location (arrow).

6a

Figure 6:

(6a) T2-weighted image at the same level as (2c), again demonstrates the difficulty of distinguishing a T2-hyperintense free disc fragment (arrow) from epidural fat and cerebrospinal fluid.

 

If a free fragment is not recognized on MR images, a confusing clinical picture may result. A migrated free fragment may cause nerve root compression at a level different than the parent disc, yet changes at the parent disc may be the most obvious abnormality on the MR. Clinical findings may thus contradict the patient’s most noticeable MR findings. Careful image evaluation allows the true cause of patient symptoms to be recognized in such cases.

The diagnosis of a sequestered disc herniation may significantly alter treatment options. Free fragments are a contraindication to percutaneous discectomy and chemonucleolysis techniques.4 The presence of a free fragment often necessitates a more extensive surgical approach to ensure complete removal. Failure to recognize and remove a free disc fragment will often lead to an unsatisfactory post-operative result, underscoring the importance of their detection in pre-surgical planning.

 

Conclusion

Free disc fragments may exhibit MR signal characteristics that make their detection difficult. Reliance on T2-weighted images for the detection of disc herniations may result in decreased sensitivity for free disc fragments, which often demonstrate high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Utilization of T1-weighted sequences greatly improves the detection of disc fragments in such cases.

 

References

1 Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, Covington LA:Posterior Extradural Lumbar Disk Fragment. Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association 1999;8(3):222-228

2 Snow RD, Williams JP,Weber ED, et al:Enhancing transdural lumbar disk herniation. Clin Imaging 19:12-16, 1995

3 Glickstein MF, Burke L, Kressel HY: Magnetic resonance demonstration of hyperintense herniated discs and extruded disk fragments. Skeletal Radiol 1989;18:527-530

4 Modic MT: Degenerative disorders of the spine. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine (chapter 3); Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS (eds). Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc.; Chicago 1989.

Search the Archives

Explore by Subject

Ready to see ProtonPACS for yourself?

Our demo is free with no obligations.